Insane Liberals Hit Rock Bottom: Now Attacking The Parents Of 9 Year Old Girl Murdered In Arizona

Just when you think the left can sink no lower, turns out they are nowhere near rock bottom. This certainly gets them closer though.

Steve Watson reports:

How low will some people stoop to play at partisan politics by exploiting the weekend’s tragic events? We’ve already seen the bar set pretty damn low by elements of the media and some public officials, yet its hard to imagine how much further anyone can go than to verbally attack the parents of the slain 9 year old Christina Taylor Green.
Yet this is exactly what sometime AOL writer Jeanne Sager does in an article published today on parenting blog Cafemom.com.

Here's just a taste of this nasty liberal's rant:

Seeing the couple on Dateline NBC last night, my first inclination was to grit my teeth and ask what kind of parent is ready to go on national TV 24 hours after the loss of their child?

The same type of parents who paraded their child out in a book about babies born on 9/11/01? They don’t deserve to be parents if they’re going to use horrors for their own gains.

.... watching the Greens so exacting as they spoke of their daughter, so unfeeling. What, you couldn’t even summon a tear for your little girl? Everywhere I look, they’re talking to the media. To Fox News. To USA Today.

Steve Watson goes on [emphasis mine]

Exactly what “gains” are we talking about here Ms Sager? Their beloved child has just been shot dead. What in the world makes you believe they are gaining anything?

Obviously Sager missed the entirety of John Green’s appearance on Fox News, in which he defiantly fought back the tears to convey the message that this awful but completely isolated and random event should not be exploited to revoke the core freedoms protected under the first and second amendments.

“We don’t need any more restrictions on our society,” Mr Green said, adding that sometimes our continued freedom comes at an awful cost.

While Sager stops her attack short and admits it is “completely unfair” and that she “feels sorry” for the family, it doesn’t prevent her from ending the piece with the question “Did you find yourself wondering why the Greens didn’t get off TV?”

The Greens are not fitting neatly into the script for those so called “liberals” that are happy to exploit the cold blooded murder of a child for political grist.

Presumably, Sager and her ilk would have no qualms with the TV appearances of the Greens should they have demanded the immediate passage of laws to make perceived threats a federal crime or to introduce hastily thrown together gun control bills.

The fact that their despicable smear machine has already ground to a halt in the wake of the revelation that gunman Jared Lee Loughner was a left-wing, pot-smoking liberal, rather than a flag waving tea party Sarah Palin supporter, is one blessing that the still sane can count.

Perhaps the only other is that in amongst a barrage of shameless partisan exploitation of another tragic event, Americans have been reminded that in the face of danger and darkness, there are still those who believe in preserving the values the nation was founded on, rather than tearing them apart.

It's amazing. While a normal human being hears John Green, a father expressing his grief, as well as calling for the nation to remain calm, and not rush to blame, the liberal trash sees an opportunity to attack the man, and accuse him of what they, themselves are doing: Exploiting this horrific event for political gain. [something the left has been doing since the first shot rang out]

This is typical of the left. They want to feel superior, and will blame the victims if they don't share their twisted ideology.

Watson is right when he points out that if Mr Green was a liberal, and spewing the usual liberal hysteria and calling for more government intervention, exploiting the tragedy to the fullest, nothing would have been said. Mr Green would have been hailed a some sort of hero.

When Sarah Palin's young children were attacked by the vile left wing hate machine [and this includes her newborn son] the left's excuse was "she put them out the for us to attack."

The kind of mentality that thinks that way is wicked and vile. But the kind of diseased mentality that thinks it's OK to attack the parents of a beautiful little girl who was murdered by a deranged, left wing nut bag, is despicable, deplorable, and down right evil.

Democrat: The Party Of Murder, Racism, And Hate

The modern day democrat/communist party is nothing more than a group of malcontents, bent on destroying the very fabric of American society, all of the things that make America great.

As all of these people are students of the Saul Alinsky method, they attack absolutely anyone and everyone who dare disagree with their plans in any way, even their own.

Democrat/communists routinely attack those who disagree with them, or call them out on their continual and massive lies. One of Alinsky ‘s "Rules" is in continual use by the dishonest Obamacentric media, the democrat/communist party, and of course, the White House.

Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it. In conflict tactics there are certain rules that [should be regarded] as universalities. One is that the opposition must be singled out as the target and 'frozen.'...

"...any target can always say, Why do you center on me when there are others to blame as well?' When your 'freeze the target,' you disregard these [rational but distracting] arguments.... Then, as you zero in and freeze your target and carry out your attack, all the 'others' come out of the woodwork very soon. They become visible by their support of the target...'

"One acts decisively only in the conviction that all the angels are on one side and all the devils on the other."

You’ve seen this put into practice daily for years, but Obama and his thugocracy have elevated Alinsky’s "Rules" to an art form.. The left has tried it with Rush Limbaugh when he called out Obama, they tried it on members of the Tea Party movement, and when one of their own, the affable, and incredibly likeable Joe Lieberman, dared to stray from the party line on ObamaCare.

The hateful democrat/communist party and all of their helpers in the media not only "personalized and polarized" their attacks on Joe, but his lovely wife as well!

Mrs. Lieberman happens to be an ambassador for the Susan G Koman Foundation, certainly a good cause. The hatemongers in the democrat/communist party were demanding that she be fired from her position.

Of course, for Joe, this is nothing new. While the rest of the democrat/communists were attacking George Bush on the war, to score political points with their moonbat base, Joe Lieberman crossed over and supported Bush’s efforts to keep America safe.

The democrat/communists were so angered they found a primary challenger, Ned Lamont, and sent every hack to Connecticut, spent tons of money, and of course, called out the ACORN thugs, to defeat Joe.

Don’t forget, Lieberman was the vice presidential candidate on the losing ticket in 2000, along with global warming scammer, Al Gore. In the democrat/communist party, dissent is not tolerated in any way, shape, or form.

This is typical of the democrat/communist party. This was published on the far left hate website, the Huffington Post:


You ever notice that while claiming to be the party of the minorities, the party that "defends" blacks and gays, the number one way they use to ridicule people they disagree with, is to either portray them as "black" or call them a "faggot."

In the end, Lieberman ran as an independent, and won his re-election bid. The democrat/communists were also incredibly angered when Lieberman crossed over to support John McCain and Sarah Palin rather the joke of a candidate that now resides in the White House.

Speaking of Sarah Palin, she is a case study unto herself about how the hatemongering democrat/communist movement uses Alinsky on a daily basis. The hate filled party and the media (yes, I understand that’s redundant) went into warp drive trying to destroy Sarah Palin.

They attacked her at every step. They attacked her husband, they attacked her children, they attacked her friends. We’ve not seen anything like it in modern history. The attacks were vile, vicious and incredibly over the top. They also used this time honored Alinsky "Rule":

"Ridicule is man's most potent weapon. It is almost impossible to counteract ridicule. Also it infuriates the opposition, which then reacts to your advantage."

Of course, much to their shock and dismay, Sarah Palin is more than up to the task of counteracting everything they throw at her. Sarah, you see, is just too strong, and just to powerful in her convictions.

One notes that to this day, those on the left cannot and will not discuss actual policy differences they have with Palin, it’s because they cannot compete in the marketplace of ideas. All those in the democrat/communist party know is attack, attack, attack.

Lest you wonder how intertwined the teachings of the anti-American Communist revolutionary, and Chicago native, Alinsky, are with the modern day democrat/communist party in general, and Barack Obama in particular, please remember that Obama, in his capacity as a trainer for ACORN, was responsible for teaching their "thugs for hire" the Alinsky "Rules."



The website Crossroads offers this commentary on both Obama as well as Hillary Clinton:

Background information:

"Obama learned his lesson well. I am proud to see that my father's model for organizing is being applied successfully beyond local community organizing to affect the Democratic campaign in 2008. It is a fine tribute to Saul Alinsky as we approach his 100th birthday." --Letter from L. DAVID ALINSKY, son of Neo-Marxist Saul Alinsky


Hillary, Obama and the Cult of Alinsky: "True revolutionaries do not flaunt their radicalism, Alinsky taught. They cut their hair, put on suits and infiltrate the system from within. Alinsky viewed revolution as a slow, patient process. The trick was to penetrate existing institutions such as churches, unions and political parties".... Many leftists view Hillary as a sell-out because she claims to hold moderate views on some issues. However, Hillary is simply following Alinsky’s counsel to do and say whatever it takes to gain power.

"Barack Obama is also an Alinskyite.... Obama spent years teaching workshops on the Alinsky method. In 1985 he began a four-year stint as a community organizer in Chicago, working for an Alinskyite group called the Developing Communities Project.... Camouflage is key to Alinsky-style organizing. While trying to build coalitions of black churches in Chicago, Obama caught flak for not attending church himself. He became an instant churchgoer." (By Richard Poe, 11-27-07)

Hillary Clinton, a Chicago gal, is also a disciple of the Alinsky school of thought. Also from Crossroads:

Hillary Clinton's 1969 Political Science Thesis ("There is Only the Fight") refers to an earlier version of Alinsky’s training manual. "In 1946," she wrote, "Alinsky's first book, Reveille for Radicals, was published."

Interesting little fact from the opening page of Alinsky’s Rules For Radicals:

Dedication

"Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology, and history... the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom — Lucifer."

That’s right, Alinsky dedicated, what has become the democrat/communist party’s bible, to Satan, the Devil himself!

Kind of says it all, huh?

Now while most try and hide, some democrat/communists are feeling their oats these days, and are openly calling Saul Alinsky their "hero" as dim-witted newscaster Chris Matthews recently did on his barely watched MSNBC show, Hardball:







Matthews, by the way, is talking to Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders, who is a member of the socialist party. Like him or not, you gotta respect him, at least old Bernie has the guts to openly admit what he is, and actually stand for election based on that, something democrat/communists don’t have the guts to do.

The problem, of course, is the democrat/communists simply cannot compete in the marketplace of ideas. They must shield everything they do behind lies and distortion, because the American people, as we are seeing, do not want to be communists. The American people soundly resist, and reject everything the democrat/communist party agenda is truly about, wen they learn the truth.

This is why rather than truly explain their positions, and present the arguments why they think their way is the way to go, they just attack, attack, attack.

Of course, Alinsky didn’t introduce hate into the democrat party, or even communism. FDR was a closet communist, or if you prefer a more charitable term, a socialist, not that there is any real difference, all of the isms, liberalism, socialism, fascism, and communism are always spectacular failures, every time they are tried.

No, the democrat/communist party has a long legacy of hate, violence, and racism. And that’s what I really want to talk about today. The lead photo in this piece is one of Margaret Sanger, the democrat/communist icon of the abortion death cult the democrat/communists lovingly refer to as the "pro-choice movement."

Of course, we all know that Margaret Sanger is the founder of what is now known as Planned Parenthood, the Holy Church of the democrat/communist party. A group who has murdered babies by the millions, and a group that is substantially funded by American tax payer dollars.

The annual Margaret Sanger Awards, given out by Planned Parenthood, "to recognize leadership, excellence, and outstanding contributions to the reproductive health and rights movement," are some of the most coveted awards a democrat/communist can be given.

Hillary Clinton was a 2009 recipient. And for those that remember the New York 23 congressional special election from last year, one of the real issues with so-called "moderate" Republican DeDe Sczzafava, besides the fact that she was really a radical "progressive" democrat/communist, or as columnist Mark Steyn called her, a DIABLO (Democrat In All But Name Only) was the fact that she was a Margaret Sanger Award winner.

This and her radical far left record in the New York Statehouse is what led to a Conservative Party candidate, Doug Hoffman, to enter the race.

Of course, one cannot speak of Margaret Sanger, without mentioning the Klu Klux Klan, another creation of the democrat/communist party. Remember, the democrat/communists still have a member of the Klan serving in the United States Senate to this day, Robert Byrd, of West Virginia.

Sanger spoke at many Klan rallies to the women, and as I have written many times, she was a leading proponent of eugenics, and said to have been an inspiration to both Adolf Hitler and Josef Mengele. In the early 20th century, American "progressives" lead the world in this field. Sanger referred to blacks as "human weeds."

Peter Heck writes in the Perspectives section of the One News Now website:

Move over, KKK

Back in February, Eric Holder – the country's first black Attorney General – announced that we were a nation of cowards because, "we, as average Americans, simply do not talk enough to each other about race." Holder is right.


That there are still organizations operating in this country that demonize, target, and victimize innocent people simply because of the color of their skin is unconscionable. That there are still hate groups in our midst whose very foundation is rooted in a malevolent contempt for minorities is disgusting. That, while we stand quietly, there are those working daily inside this country to commit genocide against blacks is an abomination. And worse, still others go beyond complicit silence and actually attempt to give legitimacy and offer defense for such institutions perpetrating these atrocities.


These devastating realities only prove Holder's assertion to be accurate. It is inescapable...as long as Planned Parenthood continues to operate in this country, we are a nation of cowards.

In her book The Pivot of Civilization, Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger wrote that unless something was done to stop them, those living in the slums (blacks, Hispanics, and Jews) would eventually leave the boundaries of their neighborhoods and mix with the better parts of society (whites). Their inferior genes, she argued, would then infect the rest of us. Therefore, she suggested we cease all charitable giving to the inner-city poor, segregate these "morons, misfits, and maladjusted," sterilize these "genetically inferior races," and begin a process of eliminating such "human weeds."


And her organization, Planned Parenthood, has done just that. In the 1980s, the organization began intentionally targeting black inner-city neighborhoods for their clinics. Author George Grant pointed out that, "of the more than 100 school-based clinics that have opened nationwide in the [1980s]...all have been at black, minority, or ethnic schools." By 1991, Planned Parenthood was reporting that 43 percent of all its abortions were performed on minorities – a time when the minorities accounted for only 19 percent of the total population. And in a comparative analysis between the 2000 U.S. Census data and the location of Planned Parenthood clinics, Cybercast News Service concluded, "The results appear to bolster the charge that the organization targets black communities."


Consider also a recent sting operation conducted by The Advocate, a student magazine at UCLA. In the sting, an actor posed as a potential donor to Planned Parenthood wanting to contribute his money to help "lower the number of black people." In the seven states where the sting took place, each clinic agreed to take the racially earmarked contribution, with none of them expressing concern over the motivation. In one exchange, the actor said, "the less black kids out there, the better." The Planned Parenthood director responded by saying such sentiments were "understandable."


Combine those grim realities and you begin to see that Planned Parenthood is doing its part to carry on the eugenic and racist policies of its founder. But don't take my word for it. Alan Guttmacher, who led Planned Parenthood for 12 years, stated, "We are merely walking down the path that Ms. Sanger has carved out for us." And recent Planned Parenthood President Faye Wattleton stated she was "proud" to be "walking in the footsteps" of Sanger. When you consider that Wattleton is black, it is difficult to know whether to be outraged or just cry at such a statement.


As a leftist himself – whose boss got elected to the White House thanks in no small part to contributions from Planned Parenthood and its allies – I recognize that Eric Holder certainly wasn't calling for an open discussion about the abortion mills' racial genocide. This only proves that while preaching against racial cowardice, Holder is ignoring his own. You simply can't be taken seriously when discussing America's racism problems if you are willing to ignore the greatest perpetrators of racial injustice in our midst.


Talk to me all you want about Rush Limbaugh and his comments regarding Donovan McNabb. If you are not simultaneously sickened by the revolting racism of Planned Parenthood...if you are not demanding that immediate action be taken against it and the evil it encourages...if you are not ashamed that such a group continues to operate with a third of its budget financed with your tax dollars...you are a coward with absolutely no credibility to ever be taken seriously on this issue.

As you see, not much has changed since the days that Sanger herself oversaw Planned Parenthood. The group is still "tending to the weeds."

The website Black Genocide has a lengthy article on Sanger and Planned Parenthood, here’s the first few paragraphs:

How Planned Parenthood Duped America

At a March 1925 international birth control gathering in New York City, a speaker warned of the menace posed by the "black" and "yellow" peril. The man was not a Nazi or Klansman; he was Dr. S. Adolphus Knopf, a member of Margaret Sanger's American Birth Control League (ABCL), which along with other groups eventually became known as Planned Parenthood.

Sanger's other colleagues included avowed and sophisticated racists. One, Lothrop Stoddard, was a Harvard graduate and the author of The Rising Tide of Color against White Supremacy. Stoddard was something of a Nazi enthusiast who described the eugenic practices of the Third Reich as "scientific" and "humanitarian." And Dr. Harry Laughlin, another Sanger associate and board member for her group, spoke of purifying America's human "breeding stock" and purging America's "bad strains." These "strains" included the "shiftless, ignorant, and worthless class of antisocial whites of the South."

Not to be outdone by her followers, Margaret Sanger spoke of sterilizing those she designated as "unfit," a plan she said would be the "salvation of American civilization".: And she also spoke of those who were "irresponsible and reckless," among whom she included those " whose religious scruples prevent their exercising control over their numbers." She further contended that "there is no doubt in the minds of all thinking people that the procreation of this group should be stopped." That many Americans of African origin constituted a segment of Sanger considered "unfit" cannot be easily refuted.

While Planned Parenthood's current apologists try to place some distance between the eugenics and birth control movements, history definitively says otherwise. The eugenic theme figured prominently in the Birth Control Review, which Sanger founded in 1917. She published such articles as "Some Moral Aspects of Eugenics" (June 1920), "The Eugenic Conscience" (February 1921), "The purpose of Eugenics" (December 1924), "Birth Control and Positive Eugenics" (July 1925), "Birth Control: The True Eugenics" (August 1928), and many others.

Black Genocide is a great reference website, I encourage everyone to explore it and learn more about the institutional racism, hate, and murder practiced by the democrat/communist party.

This thinking is very much alive and well in the Obama White House. As Michelle Malkin reported back in July of 2009, John Holdren, Obama’s Science Czar is a stark raving lunatic, pretty much like everyone else that works for the White House. Eugenics is a special kind of evil and as Malkin points out, Holdren is a stanch supporter:

Looks like Supreme Court justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg isn’t the only one who’s been channeling eugenicist Margaret Sanger.

Internet sleuth Zombie has a new report on John Holdren, President Obama’s science czar:

Forced abortions. Mass sterilization. A "Planetary Regime" with the power of life and death over American citizens.

The tyrannical fantasies of a madman? Or merely the opinions of the person now in control of science policy in the United States? Or both?

These ideas (among many other equally horrifying recommendations) were put forth by John Holdren, whom Barack Obama has recently appointed Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, Assistant to the President for Science and Technology, and Co-Chair of the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology — informally known as the United States’ Science Czar. In a book Holdren co-authored in 1977, the man now firmly in control of science policy in this country wrote that:

• Women could be forced to abort their pregnancies, whether they wanted to or not;

• The population at large could be sterilized by infertility drugs intentionally put into the nation’s drinking water or in food;

• Single mothers and teen mothers should have their babies seized from them against their will and given away to other couples to raise;

• People who "contribute to social deterioration" (i.e. undesirables) "can be required by law to exercise reproductive responsibility" — in other words, be compelled to have abortions or be sterilized.

• A transnational "Planetary Regime" should assume control of the global economy and also dictate the most intimate details of Americans’ lives — using an armed international police force.

Impossible, you say? That must be an exaggeration or a hoax. No one in their right mind would say such things.

Well, I hate to break the news to you, but it is no hoax, no exaggeration. John Holdren really did say those things, and this report contains the proof. Below you will find photographs, scans, and transcriptions of pages in the book Ecoscience, co-authored in 1977 by John Holdren and his close colleagues Paul Ehrlich and Anne Ehrlich. The scans and photos are provided to supply conclusive evidence that the words attributed to Holdren are unaltered and accurately transcribed.

Zombie’s got all the goods. Read the whole thing.

Nice, huh. This sort of lines up with Cass Sunstein, another loon, and an actual Obama cabinet member, confirmed by the Senate. Sunstein is a column all unto himself! Also, please note that Paul Ehrlich wrote a book called The Population Bomb, which basically calls for mass murder on an industrial scale, to save the planet.

It also lines up quite nicely with what Sarah Palin famously called "death panels, " the rationing of health care to the elderly, disabled, and chronically ill. So important are these "death panels" to the democrat/communist party, that Senate Majority Leader, Harry Reid,knowing that when they take power, repealing ObamaCare will be job one for Republicans, placed a provision that would make it virtually impossible to take the "death panels" provisions out of the bill, even if the entire bill was somehow repealed.

We discuss this at length in our piece entitled, Sarah Palin: Midnight Votes, Backroom Deals, and a Death Panel: The Continuing Constitutional Crisis.

These "death panels" are part of Obama’s health care adviser Dr Ezekiel Emanuel’s master plan.

And lest you think Big Health Care and Big Abortion are the only two groups of democrat/communists who wish to advocate the destruction of humanity, or at least the "undesirables," please note the lengthy list of quotes from high profile and well known global warming loons we put together in our piece, Climate Change Zealots: Not Just Wrong, But Pure Evil Too.

Speaking of quotes, here is an "impressive" series of quotes from Margaret Sanger our friend and colleague Bardsmith compiled for us:

"The most merciful thing that a family does to one of its infant members is to kill it." --Margaret Sanger

"Birth control must lead ultimately to a cleaner race." --Margaret Sanger

"We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don't want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population…" --Margaret Sanger

"Eugenic sterilization is an urgent need ... We must prevent multiplication of this bad stock." --Margaret Sanger

"Eugenics is … the most adequate and thorough avenue to the solution of racial, political and social problems." --Margaret Sanger

"Birth control itself, often denounced as a violation of natural law, is nothing more or less than the facilitation of the process of weeding out the unfit, of preventing the birth of defectives or of those who will become defectives." --Margaret Sanger

"The unbalance between the birth rate of the 'unfit' and the 'fit,' [is] the greatest present menace to civilization… the most urgent problem today is how to limit and discourage the over-fertility of the mentally and physically defective." --Margaret Sanger

"Our failure to segregate morons who are increasing and multiplying… a dead weight of human waste… an ever-increasing, unceasingly spawning class of human beings who never should have been born at all." --Margaret Sanger

"The undeniably feeble-minded should, indeed, not only be discouraged but prevented from propagating their kind." --Margaret Sanger

"The marriage bed is the most degenerative influence in the social order..."

--Margaret Sanger

"[Our objective is] unlimited sexual gratification without the burden of unwanted children..." --Margaret Sanger

"[Mandatory] sterilization for [the insane and feeble-minded] is the answer." --Margaret Sanger

"Give dysgenic groups [people with 'bad genes'] in our population their choice of segregation or [compulsory] sterilization." --Margaret Sanger

Margaret Sanger proposed the American Baby Code that states, "No woman shall have the legal right to bear a child… without a permit for parenthood."

Margaret Sanger also proposed the Population Congress with the aim, "...to give certain dysgenic groups in our population their choice of segregation or sterilization."

"Always to me any aroused group was a good group, and therefore I accepted an invitation to talk to the women's branch of the Ku Klux Klan..."

Remember these quotes the next time you hear a prominent democrat who supports Planned Parenthood speak, especially if they are "proud " Margaret Sanger Award winners.

Another great reference website is The Truth About Margaret Sanger

Although it got little attention beyond the Conservative movement, when Barack Obama was elected, the National Black Republican Association drafted a proclamation petitioning President Obama for an official apology from the democrat/communist party for it’s 150 year history of systematic racism:

President Obama, Can You Spare A Proclamation

The National Black Republican Association has issued a petition to Barack Hussein Obama, the leader of the Democratic Party, requesting that Obama issue a formal proclamation of apology for the Democratic Party's 150-year history of racism.

We recognize that this is likely too much to ask of the oh so "racially sensitive" Democrats who want us to ignore their racist past and failed socialism that have caused so much harm to black Americans. So we will not hold our breath waiting for their response.

_______________________________

Petition to Barack Hussein Obama for a Proclamation of Apology for the Democratic Party's 150-year History of Racism

We, black American citizens of the United States and the National Black Republican Association, declare and assert:

WHEREAS, the healing of wounds begins with an apology, and the Democratic Party has never apologized for their horrific atrocities and racist practices against black Americans during the past 150 years, nor held accountable for the residual impact that those atrocities and practices are having on us today,

WHEREAS, as a result of the 1898 Wilmington Race Riot Commission Report of May 31, 2006, the North Carolina Democratic Party issued a unanimous apology on January 20, 2007 for the Democratic Party's 1898 murderous rampage against blacks,

WHEREAS, inner-city minister Rev. Wayne Perryman wrote a book, "Unfounded Loyalty: An In-depth Look Into The Love Affair Between Blacks and Democrats", and filed a lawsuit against the Democratic Party on December 10, 2004, but, after admitting their history of racism under oath in court, the Democrats refused to apologize,

WHEREAS, history shows that the Democratic Party through its racist agenda and "States' Rights" claim to own slaves, sought to protect and preserve the institution of slavery from 1792 to 1865, thus enslaving millions of African Americans, while the Republican Party was started in 1854 as the anti-slavery party, fought to free blacks from slavery and championed civil rights for blacks,

WHEREAS, the Democratic Party enacted fugitive slave laws to keep blacks from escaping from plantations; instigated the 1856 Dred Scott decision which legally classified blacks as property; passed the Missouri Compromise to spread slavery into 50% of the new Northern states; and passed the Kansas-Nebraska Act designed to spread slavery into all of the new states,

WHEREAS, the Democratic Party in the South formed the Confederacy, seceded from the Union and fought a Civil War (1861 to 1865) to expand slavery where over 600,000 citizens were killed, including many thousand blacks,

WHEREAS, starting in 1861, anti-Civil War Democrats in the North were called "copperheads" like the poisonous snake because they (a) wanted to appease the South and accept a negotiated peace that would have resulted in an independent Confederacy where blacks were kept in slavery, and (b) showed their deep opposition to the Civil War draft by taking their anger out on blacks, murdering and maiming blacks in virtually every Northern state,

WHEREAS, anti-Civil War Democrats in New York engaged in "Four Days of Terror" against the city's black population from July 13-16, 1863, and the anti-Civil War chant of the Democrats, as reported by one Pennsylvania newspaper, was: "Willing to fight for Uncle Sam", but not "for Uncle Sambo,"

WHEREAS, the anti-Civil War Democrats verbally attacked Republican President Abraham Lincoln because he wanted to free the slaves through war and grant blacks civil rights, and drafted Northern men into the army to fight and die to make his Emancipation Proclamation a reality - a Proclamation that became the source of the Juneteenth celebrations that occur in black communities today,

WHEREAS, after the Civil War, the Republican Party (a) pushed to amend the Constitution to grant blacks freedom (13th Amendment), citizenship (14th Amendment) and the right to vote (15th Amendment); (b) passed the Civil Rights Acts of 1866 and 1875; and (c) designed Reconstruction, a ten-year period of unprecedented political power for African Americans,

WHEREAS, anti-civil rights Democrat Andrew Johnson became president when Republican President Abraham Lincoln was assassinated, and after the Civil War, the Democratic Party fought to end Reconstruction and deny blacks the promised "40 acres and a mule;" fought to overturn all civil rights legislation from the 1860's to the 1960's; and passed repressive legislation including the Black Codes and Jim Crow laws,

WHEREAS, the book "A Short History of Reconstruction" by the renowned historian, Dr. Eric Foner, revealed that: (a) the Ku Klux Klan was founded in 1866 by Democrats as a Tennessee social club; (b) the Ku Klux Klan became a military force serving the interests of the Democratic Party, the planter class, and all those who desired the restoration of white supremacy; and (c) the Ku Klux Klan spread into other Southern states, launching a 'reign of terror' against Republican leaders, black and white,

WHEREAS, the book "A Short History of Reconstruction" by Dr. Eric Foner exposed the facts that: (a) the Hayes-Tilden Compromise of 1877 was an attempt by Republicans to get the Democrats to stop lynching Republicans, black and white, and respect the rights of blacks; and (b) contrary to legend, President Rutherford Hayes did not remove the last federal troops from the South, but merely ordered federal troops surrounding the South Carolina and Louisiana statehouses to return to their barracks,

WHEREAS, after taking control of Congress in the late 1800's, the Democratic Party passed the Repeal Act of 1894 that overturned civil rights legislation passed by the Republicans, including the Civil Rights Acts of 1866 and 1875,

WHEREAS, the Democratic Party supported the "Plessy v. Ferguson" decision in 1896 that established the "separate but equal" segregation doctrine,

WHEREAS, historical documents show that: (a) in an effort to stop the Democrats from lynching and denying civil rights to blacks, the NAACP was founded on Republican President Abraham Lincoln's 100th birthday, February 12, 1909, by white Republicans Oswald Garrison Villard, Mary White Ovington and William English Walling; and (b) the first black general secretary of the NAACP was black Republican James Weldon Johnson who became the general secretary of the NAACP in 1920 and, in 1900, wrote the song, "Lift Every Voice," known as the "Black National Anthem" in collaboration with his brother, John Rosamond Johnson,

WHEREAS, after Democrat President Woodrow was elected in 1912 and while Congress was controlled by the Democrats, black American civil employees where pushed out of federal government jobs, and the greatest number of bills proposing racial segregation and discrimination were introduced than had ever been proposed in our nation's history,

WHEREAS, even though Democrat President Franklin D. Roosevelt received the vote of many black Americans due to his "New Deal," he banned black American newspapers from the military because he was convinced the newspapers were communists and rejected anti-lynching laws pushed by Republicans, as well as efforts by Republicans to establish a permanent Civil Rights Commission that did not get established until 1958 under Republican President Dwight Eisenhower,

WHEREAS, Democrat President Harry Truman not only rejected Republican efforts to enact anti-lynching laws and establish a permanent Civil Rights Commission, but also failed to enforce his 1948 Executive Order designed to desegregate the military, an order that was not effectively enforced until Republican President Dwight Eisenhower was elected,

WHEREAS, with the party slogan: "Segregation Forever!," the Dixiecrats, who were Democrats, (a) formed the States' Rights Democratic Party for the presidential election of 1948; (b) remained Democrats for all local elections and all subsequent national elections; and (c) did not all migrate to the Republican Party as Democrats today falsely claim, but instead those racist Democrats died Democrats and had declared that they would rather vote for a "yellow dog" than a Republican because the Republican Party was known as the party for blacks,

WHEREAS, during the civil rights era of the 1960's, the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., who was a Republican, was fighting the Democrats including: (a) Democrat Georgia Governor Lester Maddox who famously brandished ax handles to prevent blacks from patronizing his restaurant; (b) Democrat Public Safety Commissioner Eugene "Bull" Connor in Birmingham who let loose vicious dogs and turned fire hoses on black civil rights demonstrators; and (c) Democrat Alabama Governor George Wallace who stood in front of the Alabama schoolhouse in 1963 and thundered: "Segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever,"

WHEREAS, the Democratic Party supported the Topeka, Kansas school board in the "Brown v. the Board of Education of Topeka", Kansas (a 1954 Supreme Court decision by Chief Justice Earl Warren who was appointed by Republican President Dwight Eisenhower) which declared that the "separate but equal" doctrine violated the 14th Amendment and ended school segregation,

WHEREAS, in 1954, Democrat Arkansas Governor Orville Faubus tried to prevent the desegregation of a Little Rock public school, resulting in Republican President Dwight Eisenhower sending federal troops to prevent violence and enforce a court order desegregating the Little Rock school,

WHEREAS, Democratic President John F. Kennedy was not a civil rights advocate because he: (a) voted against the 1957 Civil Rights Law (that was pushed by Republican President Dwight Eisenhower); (b) opposed the 1963 March on Washington by Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. (that was organized by black Republican A. Phillip Randolph); (c) authorized the FBI (supervised by his brother, Attorney General Robert Kennedy) to wiretap and investigate Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. on suspicion of being a communist in order to undermine that Civil Rights leader; (d) was later criticized by Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. for ignoring civil rights issues; and (e) only grudgingly agreed to make a telephone call to get Dr. King, Jr. out of the Birmingham jail after members of the King family requested Kennedy's help,

WHEREAS, after the nearly 100 years of opposition to civil rights laws by Democrats, Republican Senator Barry Goldwater, who voted for the 1957 Civil Rights Act and ran for president against Lyndon Johnson in 1964, was unfairly criticized by hypocritical Democrats because Goldwater was opposed to only portions of the 1964 Civil Rights Act that he believed was an unconstitutional expansion of federal powers,

WHEREAS, Democrat President Lyndon Johnson could not have achieved passage of civil rights legislation without the support of Republicans due to the strong opposition of Democrats, and in his 4,500-word State of the Union Address delivered on January 4, 1965, Johnson mentioned scores of topics for federal action, but only thirty five words were devoted to civil rights and not one word about voting rights,

WHEREAS, it was Republican Senator Everett Dirksen from Illinois, not Democrat President Lyndon Johnson, who was key to the passage of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, and Dirksen was also instrumental to the enactment of civil rights legislation in 1957 and 1960, as well as the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and the Civil Rights Act of 1968 which prohibited discrimination in housing,

WHEREAS, the chief opponents of the 1964 Civil Rights Act were Democrat Senators Sam Ervin, Albert Gore, Sr. and Robert Byrd of West Virginia, a former "Keagle" in the Ku Klux Klan, who made a 14-hour filibuster speech in the Senate in June 1964 in an unsuccessful effort to block passage of the 1964 Civil Rights Act,

WHEREAS, because Republican Senator Everett successfully fought to pass civil rights laws in the face of strong opposition to civil rights laws by the Democrats, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. hailed Senator Dirksen's "able and courageous leadership;" and "The Chicago Defender," the largest black-owned daily at that time, praised Senator Dirksen "for the grand manner of his generalship behind the passage of the best civil rights measures that have ever been enacted into law since Reconstruction,"

WHEREAS, the statement by Democrat President Lyndon Johnson about losing the South after passage of the 1964 civil rights law was not made out of a concern that racist Democrats would suddenly join the Republican Party that was fighting for the civil rights of blacks, but instead, was an expression of fear that the racist Democrats would again form a third party, such as the short-lived States' Rights Democratic Party,

WHEREAS, after Democrat President Lyndon Johnson expressed his concern that the racist Democrats in the South would be lost after the passage of the 1964 civil rights laws, Johnson's concern came true when Alabama's Democrat Governor George C. Wallace in 1968 started the American Independent Party that attracted other racist candidates, including Democrat Atlanta Mayor Lester Maddox,

WHEREAS, in March of 1968, while referring to the fact that Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. left Memphis, Tennessee after riots broke out where a teenager was killed, Democrat Senator Robert Byrd called Dr. King a "trouble-maker" who starts trouble, but runs like a coward after trouble is ignited, which motivated Dr. King to return to Memphis a few weeks later where he was assassinated on April 4, 1968,

WHEREAS, Democrats expressed little, if any, concern when the racially segregated South voted solidly for Democrats; yet unfairly deride Republicans because of the thirty-year odyssey of the South switching to the Republican Party that began in the 1970's with President Richard Nixon's "Southern Strategy," which was an effort on the part of Nixon to get fair-minded people in the South to stop voting for Democrats who did not share their values, and who were discriminating against blacks,

WHEREAS, Republican President Richard Nixon began enforcement of Affirmative Action as a merit-based system to help African Americans prosper with his 1969 Philadelphia Plan (crafted by black Republican Art Fletcher) that set the nation's first goals and timetables, as well as his 1972 Equal Employment Opportunity Act that made merit-based Affirmative Action programs the law of our nation, but Democrats turned Affirmative Action into an unfair quota system;

WHEREAS, Democrat Senator Robert Byrd who was a fierce opponent of desegregating the military complained in one letter: "I would rather die a thousand times and see old glory trampled in the dirt never to rise again than see this beloved land of ours become degraded by race mongrels, a throwback to the blackest specimen of the wilds,"

WHEREAS, in the early 1970's, Democrat Senator Robert Byrd pushed to have the Senate's main office building named after a former "Dixiecrat," Democrat Senator Richard Russell who was Senator Byrd's mentor and leading opponent of ant-lynching legislation, and in 2001 Senator Byrd was forced to apologize for using the "N-word" on television,

WHEREAS, Democrats did not denounce Democrat Senator Christopher Dodd who praised Senator Robert Byrd as someone who would have been "a great senator for any moment," including the Civil War; yet Democrats denounced Senator Trent Lott for his remarks about Senator Strom Thurmond who was never in the Ku Klux Klan and, after he became a Republican, defended blacks against lynching and the discriminatory poll taxes imposed on blacks by Democrats,

WHEREAS, Democrats today demean and discriminate against blacks including (a) Democrat Senator Ted Kennedy who called black judicial nominees "Neanderthals;" (b) Democrat Senator Harry Reid who slurred Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas as someone who could not write good English; (c) Joe Biden while he was a Senator who boasted that his home state of Delaware was a slave state; (d) Democratic Party operatives who depicted Maryland Lieutenant Governor Michael Steele on the Internet as a "Simple Sambo;" (e) cartoonist Jeff Danziger and Pat Oliphant who portrayed Secretary of State Dr. Condoleezza Rice as a "stooge" and a bare foot, "Ignorant Mammy;" (f) Democratic Senator John F. Kerry who denounced affirmative action on the floor of the Senate in the 1990's; (g) President Bill Clinton who - following in the footsteps of his mentor J. William Fulbright, a staunch segregationist - refused to enforce a court-ordered affirmative action plan while president and was himself sued for discriminating against his black employees while he was the Governor of Arkansas; and (h) Barack Hussein Obama while he was an Illinois State senator who provided funding for slum projects in Chicago that kept blacks trapped in rat and roach infested housing, as well as while he was a US senator voted against the minimum wage bill and wrote a letter of support for former Klansman Robert Byrd that helped that racist win re-election,

WHEREAS, the Democratic Party's use of deception and fear to intimidate black Americans into voting for Democrats is consistent with the Democratic Party's heritage of racism that included sanctioning of slavery and kukluxery - a perversion of moral sentiment among leaders of the Democratic Party; and the Democratic Party's racist legacy bode ill until this generation of black Americans,

NOW, THEREFORE, for the documented atrocities and accumulated wrongs inflicted upon black Americans, we submit this petition to the head of the Democratic Party, Barack Hussein Obama, for a formal proclamation of apology for the Democratic Party's 150-year history of racism.

It’s a sad and sorry legacy the democrat/communist party leaves America. This is a party that has no problem preaching hate in the streets if it helps them pass their agenda, an agenda openly opposed by the American people. Never before has our government so strongly ignored their bosses, the American people.

Remember too, this is a party that has no problem attacking other politicians, corporations, small businesses, and even private citizens, if that’s what it takes to have their way.

The new health care program, and all of the actions being taken by democrat/communists are just a continuation of a centuries old legacy of lies, hate, and violence. As we start the new decade, and the new year, a year that will see historic elections across the nation, and a real chance to start the process of reclaiming America, and the American way, we should take care to remember exactly who we are dealing with when we deal with members of the democrat/communist party.

We must continually remember, and remind all of our friends, the savage, and devious legacy that we have been afforded thanks to the democrat/communist party.

Climate Change Zealots: Not Just Wrong, But Pure Evil Too

In their efforts to bring attention to all of the greed and lies the Big Government-Climate Change-Global-Industrial Complex trade in, a group of documentarians have released a film entitled Not Evil, Just Wrong which you can learn more about here.

This is a noble effort, for sure. They attempt to tone down the heated debate over the global warming hoax, the greatest lie ever told, but as noble as it is, they miss the point. While most of those at the top of this scheme are just dishonest, greedy, and only in it for the money, others are true believers, borderline sociopaths, who wield great power and influence within the science community.

Men like Al Gore, Barack Obama, and their associates, along with giant corporations, like General Electric, are in this for the power and money. They are simply liars whose greed and lust for God-like power over all of mankind drive them. OK, with Al Gore, and Obama, there is probably some psychosis, as well.... Probably a great deal of it.... But for the most part, with this group it is all about getting filthy rich and remaking governments to take all power away from the individual and place it with the select few "enlightened leaders."

Of course, there is an inherent evil in what Barack Obama, Al Gore, and company want to do. Their plans will enslave all of mankind. They will, as Obama himself has boasted, make energy prices "skyrocket." In fact, Lord Obama calls this necessary:







The only reason, of course, that is "necessary" for energy prices to "skyrocket" is to raise taxes to feed the Big Government-Industrial-Complex that Obama and other communist "leaders" wish to construct and maintain. You see to communists, Big Government is the end all, be all, to everything. People matter little to them. Ordinary citizens only serve one purpose. Communism enslaves mankind, forcing the ordinary, "un-enlightened" to work and pay taxes. Taxes that fund their Big Government monster. Other than that, communists have little or no use for the bourgeois peasants of society.

As inherently evil as communism is, and men like Obama and Al Gore are, there are some that are far worse. These are the true believers, the real psychopaths. Obama has these sorts in his Cabinet, men like Cass Sunstein, who is in charge of regulating anything and everything in American society. This is a truly evil little man who feels you have no individual rights. While we have talked a lot about the many off the wall things this guy believes, and they are many, the one that always comes back to me is the fact this guy thinks animals should all have lawyers and be able to sue humans in court.

What’s really disheartening about Sunstein is that, unlike many of Obama’s Czars, who are appointed with no accountability, this supremely insane man was actually confirmed by the United States Senate, with some Republicans voting in the affirmative, as a member of Obama’s cabinet. Pretty much tells you the state of depravity and corruption our Congress wallows in.

Then you have John Holdren, Obama’s "Science Czar." This guy is precious. He believes in serious forced population control, as do most of those surrounding Obama. Holdren believes the Constitution would allow for forced abortions to facilitate this population control. Holdren once proposed a plan that would see sterilization agents placed in the nation’s water supply, in another charming scheme to rid the planet of all of it’s pesky people. This man is one of Obama’s close and trusted advisers.

And of course, there is Dr Death, Ezekiel Emanuel. He is the brother of Obama’s Chief-of-Staff, Rahm Emanuel. A modern day Josef Mengele, Dr Death is the architect of the health care rationing scheme that will most certainly be used to deny health care to those that Dr Death’s formula has deemed "unworthy" of any care, or as Sarah Palin has called them, "death panels."

We’ve written extensively about these three very sick, and very dangerous men. But they are just the tip of the iceberg, so to say. One of my wonderful colleagues put together a list of quotes that will raise the hairs on the back of your neck. These aren’t just random loons either. These are powerful, influential, and "highly respected" members of the United Nations, university professors, government officials, and others who are the ones being listened to, exclusively, on the subject of global warming.

These quotes simply send chills up my spine:

"Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about?"

– Maurice Strong, founder of the UN Environment Programme

"A massive campaign must be launched to de-develop the United States. De-development means bringing our economic system into line with the realities of ecology and the world resource situation."

– Paul Ehrlich, Professor of Population Studies

"The only hope for the world is to make sure there is not another United States. We can’t let other countries have the same number of cars, the amount of industrialization, we have in the US. We have to stop these Third World countries right where they are."

– Michael Oppenheimer, Environmental Defense Fund

"Global Sustainability requires the deliberate quest of poverty, reduced resource consumption and set levels of mortality control."

– Professor Maurice King

"We must make this an insecure and inhospitable place for capitalists and their projects. We must reclaim the roads and plowed land, halt dam construction, tear down existing dams, free shackled rivers and return to wilderness millions of acres of presently settled land."

– David Foreman, co-founder of Earth First!

"Complex technology of any sort is an assault on human dignity. It would be little short of disastrous for us to discover a source of clean, cheap, abundant energy, because of what we might do with it."

– Amory Lovins, Rocky Mountain Institute

"The prospect of cheap fusion energy is the worst thing that could happen to the planet."

– Jeremy Rifkin, Greenhouse Crisis Foundation

"Giving society cheap, abundant energy would be the equivalent of giving an idiot child a machine gun."

– Prof Paul Ehrlich, Stanford University

"Our insatiable drive to rummage deep beneath the surface of the earth is a willful expansion
of our dysfunctional civilization into Nature."

– Al Gore, Earth in the Balance

"The big threat to the planet is people: there are too many, doing too well economically and burning too much oil."

– Sir James Lovelock, BBC Interview

"My three main goals would be to reduce human population to about 100 million worldwide, destroy the industrial infrastructure and see wilderness, with it’s full complement of species, returning throughout the world."

-Dave Foreman, co-founder of Earth First!

"Current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class – involving high meat intake, use of fossil fuels, appliances, air-conditioning, and suburban housing – are not sustainable."

– Maurice Strong, Rio Earth Summit

"All these dangers are caused by human intervention and it is only through changed attitudes and behaviour that they can be overcome. The real enemy, then, is humanity itself."

– Club of Rome, The First Global Revolution

"Mankind is the most dangerous, destructive, selfish and unethical animal on the earth."

– Michael Fox, vice-president of The Humane Society

"Humans on the Earth behave in some ways like a pathogenic micro-organism, or like the cells of a tumor."

– Sir James Lovelock, Healing Gaia

"The Earth has cancer and the cancer is Man."

– Club of Rome, Mankind at the Turning Point

"A cancer is an uncontrolled multiplication of cells, the population explosion is an uncontrolled multiplication of people. We must shift our efforts from the treatment of the symptoms to the cutting out of the cancer. The operation will demand many apparently brutal and heartless decisions."

– Prof. Paul Ehrlich, The Population Bomb

"A reasonable estimate for an industrialized world society at the present North American material standard of living would be 1 billion. At the more frugal European standard of living, 2 to 3 billion would be possible."

– United Nations, Global Biodiversity Assessment

"A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal."

– Ted Turner, founder of CNN and major UN donor

"… the resultant ideal sustainable population is hence more than 500 million but less than one billion."

– Club of Rome, Goals for Mankind

"One America burdens the earth much more than twenty Bangladeshes. This is a terrible thing to say in order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000 people per day. It is a horrible thing to say, but it’s just as bad not to say it."

– Jacques Cousteau, UNESCO Courier

"If I were reincarnated I would wish to be returned to earth as a killer virus to lower human population levels."

– Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, patron of the World Wildlife Fund

"I suspect that eradicating small pox was wrong. It played an important part in balancing ecosystems."

– John Davis, editor of Earth First! Journal

"The extinction of the human species may not only be inevitable but a good thing."

– Christopher Manes, Earth First!

"Childbearing should be a punishable crime against society, unless the parents hold a government license. All potential parents should be required to use contraceptive chemicals, the government issuing antidotes to citizens chosen for childbearing."

– David Brower, first Executive Director of the Sierra Club

"In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill."

– Club of Rome, The First Global Revolution

"We need to get some broad based support, to capture the public’s imagination… So we have to offer up scary scenarios, make simplified, dramatic statements and make little mention of any doubts… Each of us has to decide what the right balance is between being effective and being honest."

– Stephen Schneider, Stanford Professor of Climatology, lead author of many IPCC reports

"Unless we announce disasters no one will listen."

– Sir John Houghton, first chairman of IPCC

"It doesn’t matter what is true, it only matters what people believe is true."

– Paul Watson, co-founder of Greenpeace

"We’ve got to ride this global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing in terms of economic and environmental policy."

– Timothy Wirth, President of the UN Foundation

"No matter if the science of global warming is all phony, climate change provides the greatest opportunity to bring about justice and equality in the world."

-Christine Stewart, fmr Canadian Minister of the Environment

"The climate crisis is not a political issue, it is a moral and spiritual challenge to all of humanity. It is also our greatest opportunity to lift Global Consciousness to a higher level."

– Al Gore, accepting the Nobel Peace Prize

Don’t you just love Al Gore’s last quote! Al Gore is basically saying global warming is a "religion." Wonder where the ACLU and all of the other loons who shout "separation of church and state" at the very thought of some child praying in school, or a copy of the 10 commandments, or a Christmas tree, being placed in the public square, are at on all of this? When will the lawsuits start flying?

Something tells me not to hold my breath.

If you notice, there are some common themes here. The number one theme being the elimination of mankind, or at least most of it! These people envision mass murder on a biblical scale. They see man as nothing more than a cancer on Mother Gaia!

Of course, one has to wonder, if these people feel this strongly about eliminating all of mankind, why don’t they lead by example. Why don’t they take the first step? The world could certainly get along with a few less psychopathic scientists, professors, and Big Government officials!

Another strong theme is the destruction of the United States, the greatest nation man has ever known, and the only nation where man is truly free. (at least for now)

Now one must remember that Barack Obama is 100 percent on board with all of this. These are his people. I submit most his reasons are for money, and power, but by simply endorsing the global warming hoax, he’s in bed with these people.

You ever wonder why Obama isn’t really doing anything about unemployment? Every wonder why he, and Congress are running up incredible debt? Do you even realize that since Obama has been in office that our budget deficit has quadrupled?

How about the fact that in the less than one year that Obama has been President, the United States has spent more money than all of the previous 233 years combined? I’m talking about the fact that Obama and the most corrupt Congress in our nation’s history have spent more money in less than one year, than all of the previous Presidents combined. From George Washington to George W Bush, Obama and his cronies have spent more money than all 43 Presidents, COMBINED! This of course, is unsustainable.

By the way, Congress is set to vote to raise the debt ceiling by nearly $2 trillion! This will of course give us a debt that can never be repaid, and will lead to, at best, the enslavement of all Americans into perpetuity, and at worst, the complete destruction of the nation, which is obviously the goal.

Ask yourself why Obama is doing insane things like bringing confessed terrorists to New York for a show trial. These terrorists, the masterminds of 9/11, have already confessed to their terrorism, and have been asked to be put to death. We should be asking ourselves why these terrorists have not already achieved room temperature!

Of course, by allowing these animals a show trial, complete with all of the constitutional rights guaranteed all American citizens, a few horrible things will happen: One, these animals and their attorneys, will be given discovery. They will be able to learn many top secret techniques, the names of operatives, and so on. This information will end up in the hands of terrorists world wide. Remember the trials after 1993 bombings at the World Trade Center? Attorneys for the terrorists passed key classified information to al Qaeda. This aided the very people Obama is bringing to New York in their planning for 9/11!

Another thing that will happen, is the attorneys for the terrorists will most certainly put the United States on trial. Many, myself included, see this as Obama and Holder’s way to fulfill the wet dreams of far left loons that make up the voting base of the democrat/communist party. With this trial the far left will get to see the "evil" George Bush, Dick Cheney, our CIA, and the brave men and women of our military on trial. This, of course, with cause our nation great harm.

The show trial will also provide a platform for these animals to spew their hatred for the United States on a daily basis, throughout the world’s media. As you well know, the media will hang on their every word, and corrupt outfits like the New York Times, MSNBC, and CNN with have many sympathetic stories about these "poor misunderstood souls." Why I bet Obama’s longtime preacher, the Reverend Jeremiah Wright, in his best Goddamn America style, will give another sermon about how "America’s chickens have come home to roost!"









Note that Obama doesn’t think his church and pastor of 20 plus years are "particularly controversial." Of course he doesn’t. This guy was marinated in hatred of the America since birth!

The 9/11 terrorists will use the platform of this show trial to not only broadcast hatred for America worldwide, they will use it as a powerful recruiting tool for terrorists world wide. Untold thousands, if not millions will die because of this. American assets world wide will be in danger. This will most certainly cause problems in both Iraq and Afghanistan.

Ask yourself why Obama would do this. If you are having problems, go back and read the quotes from all of the "esteemed" climate change zealots above.

Now that we’ve talked about the radical ultra-left’s goal of the destruction of America, a common goal shared by the current occupant living at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, lets talk about something even more despicable, and diabolical:

Notice how these so-called "enlightened ones" are dead set against allowing those in undeveloped nations to rise up from poverty and despair? In fact, so strong are "the enlighten’s"
desires to see these third world countries continue to remain as such, and those 100's of millions of people continue to live lives of poverty, disease, and hopelessness, that leaders of many of these nations walked out of the highly touted Copenhagen Climate Change Conference that is in progress.

Earlier, in a piece discussing Sarah Palin’s smack down of Al Gore, where she ripped Gore to shreds, which you can read here, I also talked about DDT:

We’ve seen this kind of hysteria before. Back in the 1960's the loons decided that DDT was the worst substance known to man, even though the "science" used was as faulty as it could possibly be.

A woman named Rachelle Sklar wrote a book called Silent Spring. Like Gore’s book, An Inconvenient Truth, Sklar’s book was filled with half truths and out and out lies. The bottom line is this, DDT was banned.

Now DDT is one of the greatest chemicals ever invented.... Seriously.... The guy who figured out DDT was a great pesticide won a Nobel Peace Prize. This of course is when that prize actually meant something.

DDT is very effective at killing mosquitoes. Mosquitoes, of course, carry malaria.

From a piece called: The Five Most Ridiculously Over-hyped Health Scares Of All Time:



"# 1 DDT:

If you're looking for another reason to hate that hippie friend of yours that won't shut up about the plight of every plant, animal and insect in danger of extinction, DDT is a good place to start.

Widely considered the first major victory of the environmentalist movement, DDT was banned from use in most applications thanks to a series of insanely half-assed scientific experiments and a book about birds. That book, Silent Spring, was released in 1962 and argued that DDT was not only a carcinogen, but also damaging to wildlife and, especially, certain birds. The public, upon hearing about the possibility of having to live in a world without peregrine falcons and ospreys, did what it does best in situations like this--they lost their minds without a second thought.

Soon, pesticides were the cause du jour for environmentalists and average folks that believe whatever the hell they read, and DDT was banned in 1972. The problem was, the science quoted in the book was all kinds of faulty. One scientific study that purported to show that DDT exposure led to a higher incidence of leukemia in mice was later proven to be more than a little tainted. Turns out, the mice in the experiment were fed moldy food that contained aflatoxin, a known carcinogen. When the test was repeated minus the rancid food, the test results were exactly the same, except without all of the leukemia and stuff.

As for the birds, Audubon Society studies showed that 26 different kinds of birds actually increased in population during DDT's heyday. In cases where bird populations did decline, it was revealed that in most cases the decline began either well before widespread use of DDT began or years after it was banned. Environmentalists dispute the findings, but on the other hand ... who gives a **** about the damn birds? Especially considering ...

In 1972, DDT killed fewer people than ...

Freaking malaria.

See, what many people don't know about DDT is that the person who discovered that it could be used as a pesticide actually won a Nobel Peace Prize. Why? Because it was kind of effective in fighting malaria. When spraying of DDT stopped in Ceylon (present day Sri Lanka), malaria cases rose from 17 in 1963 to 2.5 freakin’ million in 1969, an increase of approximately a bajillion fofillion percent. And to this day, the mosquito remains the deadliest killer Mother Nature has to offer, with a confirmed 2 million kills per year.

But, hey at least there's a lot more ospreys around."



Here is a real world example of why anytime someone is out there shouting and screaming like their hair is on fire, and is trying to get you to buy into their fantasy, PEOPLE DIE! Millions of them!!

Right now, if you turn on one of the TV channels that push the "green" religion like an episode of the 700 Club, you know the ones, you’ll be bombarded with ads from charities that are raising money to buy mosquito nets in bulk and send them to Africa, where millions die each and every year from malaria!

In other words, primitive 13th century technology for the 21 century. It’s truly criminal when you consider that DDT is a perfectly safe chemical that was proven to kill mosquitoes and basically wipe malaria off the face of the earth!

This would be exactly like banning polio, smallpox, or other vaccines we all routinely are give when we are kids. Can you imagine the outcry if "scientists" claimed that such beneficial vaccines should be banned, based on dubious research!

And speaking of childhood, and DDT, when we were kids growing up in the mid-sixties in our small Texas town, the city came around once a week with a pick-up truck that had a fogger mounted in the back. This old Dodge truck would go down each and every street in town during the season, spraying DDT. We didn’t have a mosquito problem.

We did have, and still do have a HUGE problem with big black birds that make a mess everywhere! They were unaffected by the "evil" concoction

Now, bounce all of that against the quotes above from the climate change zealots.

We know two things that are absolute. One, DDT is a safe and proven pesticide that kills mosquitoes, dead! Mosquitoes of course, carry malaria. Second, we know that malaria, like clockwork, kills millions world wide annually. All of these deaths are in underdeveloped third world countries.

Again, go back and read all of the quotes above.

We have a readily available solution to this problem. In fact, a Nobel Prize was awarded to researcher who discovered this wonder chemical’s effectiveness at killing mosquitoes. This was a true miracle. A real godsend. To think, millions upon millions of lives were saved from incredible suffering and death because of a simple concoction.

Nowadays, citizens in these third world disaster areas rely on charities that send mosquito nets, ancient technology, as their only safeguard against certain death! What a great way for "the enlightened" to implement their plans for reducing the world’s population. And make no mistake about it, those quoted are some of the people who strongly oppose DDT, and pretty much every pesticide known to man.

I’ve never been one to subscribe to wild conspiracy theories, but when you look at the evidence, out of these people’s own mouths, one starts to see the deliberateness of seemingly unrelated events.

It’s quite obvious that these so-called "enlightened ones" mean, in their own way, to destroy mankind. They mean to destroy the United States first though..

Now why is this? Why must the United States be destroyed?

Well, let me tell you. The United States is the greatest nation the world has ever know. The United States has done more for the greater good of all mankind, in her short 233 years, than all of the other nations in the history of the world, combined. The United States is the one nation that celebrates the individual. The United States is the one nation that celebrates individual freedom and liberty, above all.

Most importantly, the United States is the world’s last great hope for all of mankind. By her very existence, the United States gives those in the rest of the world hope. Millions upon millions are inspired by this great nation. Millions upon millions dream of coming to America and living the American dream. Just knowing the United States exists gives millions hope they would otherwise never know. The "enlightened" simply can’t allow this. Their evil plans will never come to pass as long as America exists.

Thus, America must be destroyed!

The American people will never willingly go along with the radical’s plans. Look at how Obama campaigned for his job. Why he was a cross between Ronald Reagan and Abraham Lincoln! Like most democrat/communists, Obama ran as a "centrist" if not a full blown Conservative, on many issues. Democrat/communists always must do that. If they tell you, up front, what they are about, they’d never win another election! So, thy must lie to the people, always.

The proof is in the pudding, too, as America is soundly rejecting Obama and his corrupt democrat/communist controlled Congress. Obama’s latest poll numbers bear this out. No other President has seen them so low, at this point in their presidency.

So, America must be destroyed. Schemes like the global warming hoax, which will bring about cap and trade legislation, that will not only collapse the economy, and destroy millions of jobs forever, but will also enforce radical draconian policies that will effect every single facet of your lives, must come to pass.

As if the global warming hoax isn’t enough to destroy America, and her economy, you have the most corrupt Congress in history feverishly working to totally remake our health care system into something totally unrecognizable to the American citizen.

ObamaCare will accomplish several things for the radical communists. The greatest being it will totally usurp the Constitution. Basically void it. It sets up a strict command and control central government. An all powerful affair that will be, by law, able to control the most minute details of your soon to be miserable lives.

This, of course, is in direct opposition to the intentions of our founding fathers, who saw America as a federal system where the states and the individual had all of the power, and the central government’s only purpose was to do things that enhanced and strengthened that proposition. My how far we have come!

And don’t forget about the "death panels" that Sarah Palin so eloquently talked about. Dr Death is on record as saying the very young, those under the age of 15, and the very old, those over the age of 55, are not "as deserving" of health care as those who are between the ages of 16-54. Why? Because those in the middle are the most "productive" to society. In other words, they most likely work and pay taxes to feed Big Government!

How many Americans will die because of government enforced health care rationing? Thousands? Millions? Nice way to reduce the population.

And don’t forget, these same people want to encourage doctor assisted suicide, nationwide, for older folks. These evil "enlightened ones" want to turn our wonderful doctors into a bunch of serial killers!

Thomas Jefferson thought, strongly, that we should have a revolution in the United States every 20 years. Of course, this thinking came from the other notion that the government should always fear the people. The notion that when the people fear government, as they most certainly do now, there is tyranny, but when the government fears the people, there is liberty and freedom. The threat of revolution should always be there, to keep government on it’s toes, and looking out for the people’s interests, not the interests of Big Government.

We must do absolutely everything to stop the direction that radicals like Obama, Al Gore, and other "enlightened ones" are trying to force us to take. There are most certainly more of us than there will ever be of them. It’s about time we do a little forcing of our own.

We must start working at the local level to eradicate the radical far left from civil society. We must look at every position that holds authority. From dog catcher, to the presidency, every single elected, and appointed office, must be rid of these people.

We must look at school boards. We must defeat those who push the radical agenda on our children. We must look at individual teachers. We must do away with the teachers unions that enable the radical teachers. We must look at the colleges and universities. These are breeding grounds for radical Marxists like Obama. Universities are places where communists like murdering domestic terrorist William Ayers and his convicted felon, cop-killing wife, Bernardine Dohrn are considered "respected scholars." We need to get some sane people in these "institutions of higher learning" to balance the radicals out.

And of course, we must get ready for the 2010 midterm elections. These will be the most important elections in the history of this nation. We must send the current, most corrupt Congress in our nation’s history, packing. With very few exceptions, every single seat in the House, and all of those up for grabs in the Senate, needs to change hands. We need to replace this corrupt body with solid men and women who believe in the Republic, and the Constitution. We must do this to stop Obama and his radical friends.

If nothing else, Congress holds the purse strings, and they can simply defund all of the radical ideas and out of control, runaway agencies, like the EPA, thus stopping Obama in his tracks. Once this is done, we can then focus on 2012 and getting rid of Obama forever.

In closing though, you must remember, those who are pushing the global warming hoax, are not simply folks who are wrong about things. These people are pure evil, and must be stopped for the good of all mankind.